Original Research
South African mineral law: A historical overview of the State’s regulatory power regarding the exploitation of minerals
New Contree | Vol 64 | a325 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/nc.v64i0.325
| © 2024 Elmarie van der Schyff
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 26 February 2024 | Published: 30 July 2012
Submitted: 26 February 2024 | Published: 30 July 2012
About the author(s)
Elmarie van der Schyff, Faculty of Law, North-West University, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (162KB)Abstract
The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 [MPRDA] acknowledges that the country’s mineral resources belong to the nation. The State is subsequently appointed as custodian of these resources. As custodian the State has the ultimate responsibility to grant, issue, control, administer and manage all rights in minerals. As a consequence of this wide regulatory authority a landowner’s right to deal with the minerals imbedded in the soil of his property has completely been annihilated. This article gives an historical overview of the State’s regulatory power regarding the exploitation of the country’s minerals to determine the extent to which the State has, in the past, took upon itself the power to decide where, when and by whom the country’s mineral riches could be mined. A historical perspective of the extent of the State’s regulatory powers regarding the exploitation of minerals might be beneficial when the provisions of the MPRDA are interpreted.
Keywords
Custodian; Minerals; Mineral rights; Mining; Nationalisation; Ownership; Petroleum
Metrics
Total abstract views: 459Total article views: 165